Pinged Korea poolsaarel

Maailm on juba harjunud sporaadiliste agressiooniintsidentidega 38. paralleeli ümber. Tavaliselt on selliste juhtumite ilmsiks tulek põhjustanud järsud hinnakorrektsioonid finantsturgudel, millele järgneb järk-järguline taastumine. Ka teisipävane Põhja-Korea tulistamine tõi kaasa sarnase reaktsiooni, regiooni ja ka kogu maailma aktsiaturud langesid, Lõuna-Korea valuuta nõrgenes dollari suhtes üle 4 protsendi. Kui viimastel aastatel on Korea poolsaare intsidentidesse suhtutud küllalt rahulikult, siis seekord ringleb meedias ka arvamusi, et ajalugu ei pruugi end korrata ning pinged ei ole selleks korraks veel läbi. Patrick Perret-Green kirjutab tänases Financial Times’is, et tegu on ühe tõsiseltvõetavama intsidendiga pärast 1953. aasta Korea sõda. Samas arutleb David Rothkopf Foreign Policy artiklis Why Kim Jong Il continues to make lunacy his principal export võimalike põhjuste üle, mis võisid Põhja-Koread agressioonile suunata ning järeldab, et majandusraskustes vaevlev Põhja-Korea on teinud oma sõjalistest aktsioonidest ja tuumaarsenalist suurepärase väljapressimise vahendi. Nimelt on Põhja-Korea ajalooliselt pärast sarnaseid intsidente saanud alati mingisuguse abipaketi, energia või toiduvarude täiendamise kokkuleppe vms. Selles valguses tundub eilne agressioon järjekordse püüdena varustada majandusraskustes vaevlevat riiki täiendavate ressurssidega. 

Posted By David Rothkopf Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Bill Clinton once noted that nuclear weapons were North Korea’s only cash crop. It was a wry and on-target observation that underscores a critical point. There is clearly a method to the madness of Kim Jong Il and the regime he leads.

After this week’s revelations about North Korea’s latest nuclear initiative followed by today’s exchange of fire between North Korean and ROK troops, it would be easy to suggest that the country is once again going through one of its periodic bouts of irrationality. And by any traditional calculus of behavior, it is hard to deny that a small, impoverished nation frittering away scarce resources on a giant military despite the fact that there is zero chance they could ever defeat their principal adversary seems nuts.

But that would only be the case if the value of that military were measured in traditional, abstract terms. If this measurement is balanced in the context of the North Korean leadership’s political needs, it makes more sense. Maintaining a confrontational stance with the South provides a rationale for an authoritarian state and a reason to have the forces in place to maintain that state. It also provides a useful distraction from the utter failure to create a healthy economy within the country. 

Furthermore, every time North Korea flexes its muscles, threatens its neighbor, or violates international law it gains stature unavailable to it via any other means. Think about it: North Korea has a GDP smaller than Costa Rica, roughly the half the size of that of say, the Sudan.

Finally, every time the North does one of these things, the response of the rest of the world actually, brings about benefits. After the “official condemnations” die down and the sanctions are proved to be ineffective — as they inevitably are when pitched against a country in which the will or discomfort of the people does not exactly drive the political system — North Korea gets a reward of some sort, a deal, an aid package, energy supplies, food. Best of all, the rest of the world accepts its word on vital matters even though North Korea has never ever kept its promises.

As they say in my part of Pyongyang, “such a deal.” Is it any wonder that Kim Jong Il continues to turn to his nuclear program to be his main cash crop, to make “lunacy” his country’s principal export? 

This is not to minimize the risk from the North. Actually, it underscores that it is likely to remain and fester for the foreseeable future. In fact, some observers see this week’s events as an effort by Kim Jong Il to provide “victories” for his son and heir apparent, Kim Jong-Eun. The fact that the unveiling of the sophisticated “astonishingly modern” (see today’s FT story “Kim Jong Il Plays His Aces“) uranium enrichment facilities are seen as yet both a coup for the North and a shocking intelligence failure for the United States and our allies already puts it in the win column. The fact that the exchange of gunfire today was met with communiqués and deep restraint (thus far) suggests it too may end up in the plus column for the dear leader and his clique. 

These events may also ultimately be seen as wins for Kim on two other levels. First, the nuclear facility almost certainly required international collaboration. If it turns out that support came in part from, say, Pakistan, already suspected of helping the Koreans develop a nuclear ballistic missile capability, it would be deeply embarrassing and awkward for the United States. Next, the fact that the United States and South Korea are really hamstrung on this issue, almost entirely dependent on the Chinese to put real pressure on the Koreans, makes this issue yet another that underscores how the balance of power has shifted away from Washington — even with almost 40,000 troops on the ground in South Korea and North Korea a top diplomatic priority for the administration.  

In short, call Kim strange, joke about his quirks and collection of VHS tapes. I can’t help doing so sometimes. But we ought to stop suggesting he is irrational or unpredictable. What he is doing, it’s completely in character, following a clear pattern and may very well … and yet again … pay off, precisely as he intended it to.


Rubriigid: Uudised, märksõnad: , . Salvesta püsiviide oma järjehoidjasse.

Lisa kommentaar